Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Application of techniques of biomechanics in the status evaluation and pathology correction of locomotor system

Year: 2015, volume 11 Issue: №3 Pages: 310-316
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Review
Authors: Romakina N.A., Fedonnikov A.S., Kireev S.I., Bakhteeva N.Kh., Norkin I.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

The article deals with the problem of development and the modern state of biomechanics as a scientific and practical direction in medicine under the context of technological advance herein a specific attention is paid to the achievements of the Russian schools. It is shown a necessity of wide usage of instrumental biomechanical diagnostics of locomotive disorders for intrinsic substantiation of rehabilitation treatment tactics and monitoring of its medical efficiency particularly for persons with remote effects of surgical interventions such as osteosynthesis, spondylosynthesis, total joint replacements. Non-invasive technique, possibility of its multiple application and rather low cost make actual using of locomotion clinical analysis techniques for rehabilitation treatment of concerned patients of different age groups.

1. Negreeva MB, Shenderov VA, Komogortsev IE, et al. Bio-mechanical studies in diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with lower extremities, pelvic girdle and backbone: results and perspective. Byulleten' VSNTs SO RAMN 2006; 4 (5): 201-206
2. Methods of the evaluation of rehabilitation effectiveness of prosthetic repair of lower extremities: GOST R 53871-2010. Moscow: Standartinform, 2012; 11 p.
3. Vitenzon AS, Petrushanskaya КА, Skvortsov DV. Guideline for applying method of artificial walking correction and rhythmic motions by means of program muscles stimulation. M.: MBN, 2005; 312 p.
4. Gazhe PM, Veber В. Posturology: Regulation and human body imbalance: per. s frantsuzskogo pod red. V.I. Us-acheva. SPb: Izdatel'skiy dom SPbMAPO, 2008. 316 p, ill
5. Oleynikov EV Characteristics of orthopedic and functional rehabilitation of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip under transosseous osteosynthesis applying: PhD diss.. Kurgan, 2014; 178 p.
6. Skvortsov DV Locomotion disorders diagnostics using instrumental methods: walking analysis, stabi-lometrics. Moscow: Т. M. Andreeva, 2007; 640 p.
7. Popov Gl. Biomechanics. Moscow: Izdatel'skiy tsentr «Ak-ademiya», 2013; 256 p.
8. Kruchinin PA. Mechanical models in stabilometrics. Russian Journal of Biomechanics 2014; 18 (2): 184-193
9. Samsonova AV Lecture 2: History of biomechanics.
10. Murray MP, Drout AB, Korry PC. Warking patterns of normal men. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46A (2): 335-360
11. Perry J. Gait analysis. Normal and pathological function. SLACK Inc.,1992; 524 p.
12. Sutherland DH, Olshen R, Cooper L., et al. The development of mature gait. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62A (4): 336-353
13. Duarte Marcos, Freitas S. Revision о posturography based on force plate for balance evaluation. Rev Bras Fisioter 2010; 14 (3):183-92
14. Bershteyn NA. Physiology of locomotion and activity. Moscow: Nauka, 1990; 495 p.
15. Gurfinkel' VS, Kots YaM, Shik ML. Postural regulation of human beings. Moscow: Nauka, 1965; 265p.
16. Vitenzon AS, Petrushanskaya КА, Spivak BG, et al. Characteristics of biomechanical structure of walking at different ages healthy children. Russian Journal of Biomechanics 2013; 17 (1): 78-93
17. Petrushanskaya КА, Vitenzon AS, Gritsenko GP Correlation of dynamic and electrophysiological parameters for patients of encephalic origin hemiparesis. Russian Journal of Biomechanics 2014; 18 (3): 311-325
18. Skvortsov DV Biomechanical methods in rehabilitation of walking and body balance disorders: DSc abstract. Moscow, 2008; 41 p.
19. Zhilyaev АА. Biomechanical and electrophysiological criteria of the evaluation of locomotor system of lower extremities: DSc abstract. Moscow, 2003; 31 p.
20. Kiselev DA, Grokhovskiy SS, Kubryak OV Non-surgical treatment of lower extremities support function disorders in orthopedics and neurology with using of specialized stabilometrics device ST-150. Moscow: Maska, 2011; 68 p.
21. Efimov АР. Informative value of walking biomechanical parameters for evaluation of lower extremities disorders. Russian Journal of Biomechanics 2012; 16 (1): 80-88
22. Negreeva MB, Shenderov VA, Komogortsev IE, et al. Biomechanical studies in diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with lower extremities, pelvic girdle and backbone: results and perspective. Byulleten' VSNTs SO RAMN 2006; 4 (5): 201-206
23. Bezgorodkov YuA, Kornilov NN, Petukhov Al, et al. Biomechanical indicators of standing and walking after total knee replacement with computer navigation. Traumatol-ogy and orthopedics of Russia 2011; 4 (62): 11-17
24. Dolganova Tl, Sazonova NV, Men'shikova IA, et al. Diagnostic importance of podography for patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii 2009; (4): 7-13
25. Shevtsov VI, Dolganova Tl, Karaseva TYu, Karasev EA. Suppport foot reactions indicators for patients with knee arthrosis after osteotomy and arthroscopy
26. Buravtsov РР, Shchurov VA, Dolganova Tl. Status of locomotor system before and after surgical treatment of patients with dysplastic dislocation of knee cap. Geniy ortope-dii 2014; (2): 13-16
27. Shchurov VA, Novikov Kl, Muradisinov SO. Influence of lower extremities which are different in height to the biomechanical parameters of body. Russian Journal of Biomechanics 2011; 15 (4): 102-107
28. Davydov OD, Shlykov IL, Kuznetsova NL. Biomechanical evaluation of outcomes of patients with pelvis injuries treatment. Russian Journal of Biomechanics 2011; 15 (2): 84-90
30. Schubert P, Kirchner M, Schmidtbleicher D, Christian T. Haas About the structure of posturography: Sampling duration, parametization, focus of attention (part I) J Biomedical Science and Engineering 2012; (5): 496-507
31. Lvov SE, Kuz'min AM, Kirpichev IV Stabilometric eva-lution of patient treatment outcomes for the patients with neck of femur fractures. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia 2007; 1 (43): 16-20
32. Matveev RP, Bragina SV. Orthopedic indicators dynamics at knee arthrosis after total replacement and rehabilitation. Geniy ortopedii 2014; (1): 9-12
33. Methods of the evaluation of rehabilitation effectiveness of prosthetic repair of lower extremities: GOST R 53871-2010. Moscow: Standartinform, 2012; 11 p.
34. Gusev AV, Savchenko VV, Akimova TN, et al. Interrelation between the rate of primary disablement of persons with locomotor system injuries consequences and medical care quality. Mediko-sotsial'naya ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya 2005; (3): 45-47
35. Ivanov AN, Fedonnikov AS, Norkin IA, et al. The correction of microcirculatory disorders in strategies of management of osteoarthritis and osteohondropathies. Medical Journal of the Russian Federation 2015; 21 (1): 18-23
36. Kovalenko AN, Shubnyakov II, Tikhilov RM, et al. Do new and more expensive implants better result of hip replacement? Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia 2015; (1): 5-20
37. Udartsev EYu. Syndrome and pathogenetic approach to medical rehabilitation of patients after total hip and knee replacement. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia 2011; (2): 30-36
38. National Clinical Guideline Centre. Osteoarthritis. Care and management in adults. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2014 Feb. 556 p. (Clinical-guideline; no. 177
39. Nasonova EL, ed. Clinical guidelines: Rheumatology. Pod red. Moscow: GEOTAR-media; 2005; 288 p.
40. Samorodskaya IV. Treatment of patients with osteo-arthrosis against new NICE recommendations. Medical Journal of the Russian Federation: Rheumatology 2014; 31
41. Chegurov OK, Kolesnikov SV, Kolesnikova ES, et al. Functional status evaluation for patients with different aetiopatogenetic variations of the hip arthrosis at III stage 2013; (4): 13-16
42. Sazonova NV, Shchurov VA, Dolganova Tl. Diagnostic criteria of podography and dynamometry for patients with osteoar-throsis. Byulleten'VSNTsSO RAMN2007; (6): 119-122.

2015_03_310-316.pdf313.08 KB

No votes yet