Prostate cancer diagnostics with biopsy material
Year: 2013, volume 9 Issue: №4 Pages: 632-636
Heading: Macro- and Micromorphology Article type: Original article
Authors: Fedorina Т.A., Poletaeva S.V.
Organization: Samara State Medical University
Heading: Macro- and Micromorphology Article type: Original article
Authors: Fedorina Т.A., Poletaeva S.V.
Organization: Samara State Medical University
Summary:
The aim of the article is to study the potential importance of specific location of biopsy of prostate cancer. Material and methods. Histological material from 700 patients has been examinated. 580 specimen of radical prostatectomy were examined. TRUS-guided 12-cores biopsy has been performed in all patients. Histological, computer morphomet-ric, immunohistochemal methods (PIN4-coctail, AR) were used. Results. It has been established that undergrading of carcinoma in needle biopsy occurred in 26% of patients. Overgrading of carcinoma in needle biopsy may also occur, but it was only found in 3% of cases. Undergrading results have been explained by low amount of tumor elements taken from tiny areas of carcinoma, multicentric growth and heterogenous structure of tumor. Conclusions. An important task is to identify the minimal or limited adenocarcinoma in biopsies, as tumor of >1cc volume is often found in prostatectomy specimen.
Bibliography:
1. Epstein J.I., Yang X.J. Finding of atypical glands suspicious for cancer // Epstein J.I., Yang X.J., eds. Prostate Biopsy Interpretation. Chicago: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002. P. 177-184;
2. Fadare O., Wang S., Mariappan M.R. Practice patterns of clinicians following isolated diagnoses of atypical small acinar proliferation on prostate biopsy specimens //Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2004. № 128. P. 557-560;
3. Atypical prostatic glandular proliferation on needle biopsy: diagnostic implications, use of immunohistochemistry, and clinical significance / H. Samaratunga, R.A. Gardiner, J. Yaxley [etal.]//Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 2006. №28. P. 104-110;
4. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepi-thelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era / С. К. Moore, S. Karikehalli, T. Nazeer [et al.] // J. Urol.2005. №173. P. 70-72;
5. Predictors of prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation at 10 to 12 core biopsies / V. Scat-
toni, M. Roscigno, M. Freschi [et al.] // Urology. 2005. № 66. P. 1043-1047;
6. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferation, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implication for cancer detection and biopsy strategy / C.R. Girasole, M.S. Cookson, M. J Putzi [et al.] // J. Urol. 2006. №175. P. 929-933;
7. Humphrey P. A. Focal glandular atypia // Prostate Pathology. Chicago, IL: ASCP Press, 2003. P. 218-225;
8. Bostwick D.G., Meiers I. Neoplasma of the prostate // Bostwick D.G., Cheng L, eds. Urologic Surgical Pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier, 2008. P. 462-468;
9. Hameed O., Humphrey P. A. Immunohistochemical evaluation of prostate needle biopsies using saved interval sections vs new recut sections vs new recut sections from the block: a prospective comparison // Am.J. Clin. Pathol. 2009. № 131. P. 683-688;
10. Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation: overtreatment? / M. Brausi, G. Cast-agnetti, A. Dotti [et al.] // J. Urol. 2004. № 172. P. 906-908;
11. Masljakova G.N., Voronina E.S., Fomkin R.N. Mor-fologicheskie metody issledovanija v diagnostike raka predsta-tel'noj zhelezy // Fundamental'nye issledovanija. 2012. № 12. S. 426-430.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2013-04_632-636.pdf | 1.19 MB |
Русский
English