Shock-wave therapy for combination treatment of plantar fasciitis
Year: 2019, volume 15 Issue: №4 Pages: 858-861
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Belonogov V.N., Kireev S.I., Kireev S.N., Semenov N.S.
Organization: Saratov Multidisciplinary Clinic "SOVA", Scientific Research Institute of Cardiology of Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovsky
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Belonogov V.N., Kireev S.I., Kireev S.N., Semenov N.S.
Organization: Saratov Multidisciplinary Clinic "SOVA", Scientific Research Institute of Cardiology of Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovsky
Summary:
The objective is enhancing outcomes of plantar fasciitis patients using proprietary shock-wave technique. Material and Methods. There were 65 active plantar fasciitis patients under our care, and we used shock-wave therapy as a part of their combination treatment. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the specifics oa shock-wave therapy applied to them. The proprietary technique based on the combination of local cryotherapy and heel area enthe-sises traction during shock-wave sessions was applied for patients of the main group (35 patients) while 30 patients of the control group had conventional shock-wave technique applied to them. Results. Patients of the main group showed better dynamics of pain syndrome reduction (p<0.05), as well as normalization of plantar fascia anatomy parameters on ultrasound evidence. Conclusion. The combined application of local cryotherapy as well as enthesises traction allows enhancing shock-wave therapy efficiency as a component of comprehensive medical rehabilitation of plantar fasciitis patients.
Keywords: shock-wave therapy, Plantar Fasciitis
Bibliography:
1. Wang JH, losifidis Ml, Fu FH. Biomechanical basis for tendinopathy. Clin Orthop and Related Research 2006; 443: 320-32.
2. Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of loadinduced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 409-16.
3. Abate M, Silbernagel KG, Siljeholm C, et al. Pathogenesis of tendinopathies: inflammation or degeneration? Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: 235.
4. Andres BM, Murrell GAC. Treatment of tendinopathy: what works, what does not, and what is on the horizon? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 1539-54.
5. Yu JS, Spigos D, Tomczak R. Foot pain after planter fasciotomy: An MR analysis to determine potential causes. J Comput Assist Tomog 1999; 23: 707-12.
6. Acevedo Jl, Beskin JL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19:91-7.
7. Wong MW, Tang YY, Lee SK, et al. Glucocorticoids suppress proteoglican production by human tenocytes. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (6): 927-31.
8. Ponomarenko GN. Shock-wave therapy for traumatic injuries and musculoskeletal diseases. St. Petersburg, 2012; 15 p.
9. Thomson СЕ, Crawford F, Murray GD. The effectiveness of extra corporeal shock wave therapy for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ВМС Musculoskelet Disord 2005; 6: 19.
10. Enthesopathy treatment method: patent No. 2564996 (Russian Federation)/Puchinyan DM, Kireev SI, Babushkin AV, Zejnalov PVO; published on October 10, 2015; Bull. No. 28.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2019_04_858-861.pdf | 288.57 KB |
Русский
English