Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Distinctive features of psychological status for patients with various forms of coronary heart disease

Year: 2019, volume 15 Issue: №3 Pages: 744-749
Heading: Cardiology Article type: Original article
Authors: Kodochigova A.l., Kirichuk V.F., Sinkeev M.S., Bogdanova T.M., Olenko E.S., Filonenko E.V., Slyusarenko Yu.A., Dolgov A.A., Ilyin A.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:

The purpose of the study is: to conduct comparative analysis of personal response characteristics in patients with stable and unstable forms of coronary heart disease, depending on the presence or absence of acute coronary disaster in their history. Materials and Methods. 94 men and women with an established diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD), aged 38 to 55 years were examined. All individuals under study were divided into 4 groups: two groups with stable forms of angina pectoris, and two groups with unstable angina pectoris, depending on the presence or absence of myocardial infarction history. The following tools were used to determine personal response characteristics in CHD patients: abbreviated multifactor personality questionnaire; Toronto alexithymic scale and psycho- geometric test. Re-sults. It was found that patients with coronary artery disease had a high level of neurotization, alexithymicity, conformity, pessimism, and low self-esteem, along with sociability, friendliness and desire to avoid conflict situations. Neurotic tendencies, alexithymicity and decreased activity were most pronounced in patients with history of acute coronary catastrophe (p<0.05). Conclusion. The results of the study determine advisability of including the methods of psychological correction of revealed changes in the complex of measures for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with various forms of coronary heart disease based on a personalized approach.

Bibliography:
1 Garganeeva AA. Drug therapy for patients after myocardial infarction, as the most important component of the outpatient stage of cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiosomatics 2015; 3: 22-6.
2 Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 127 (1): 6-245.
3 Gafarov VV. The World Health Organization Program "Register of acute myocardial infarction" as an audit of the assessment of public health. Bulletin of NSUU 2015; (4): 200-22.
4 Ishihara М. Clinical Presentation. Management and Outcome of Japanese Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Troponin Era — Japanese Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction Diagnosed by Universal Definition (JMINUET). Circulation Journal 2015; 79 (6): 1255-62.
5 Xu J, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD. Deaths: Final Data for 2013 National Vital Statistics Reports 2016; 64 (2): 1 -119 6 Kryuchkov DV, Artamonova GV. Primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: differences in long-term patient survival. Complex problems of cardiovascular disease 2015; 3: 47-52.
7 Tian L, Yang Y, Zhu J, et al. Impact of Previous Stroke on Short-Term Myocardial Reinfarction in Patients with Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Multicenter Study. Medicine 2016; 95 (6): 27- 42
8 Kuvshinova NYu. Psychocorrectional work with patients with ischemic disease heart taking into account the parameters of quality of life: PhD abstract. 2011; 29 p.
9 Chapala TV. Psychological risk factors in the clinical dynamics of ischemic heart diseases: PhD abstract. 2012; 25 p.
10 Dyuzheva EV Modern ideas about the role of anxiety disorders in the formation, course and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. Young scientist 2017; 2: 257-9.
11 Zaitsev VP Variant of the psychological test Mini-Mult. Psychological journal 2007; 3: 118-23.
12 Zaitsev VP, Ayvazyan ТА. Psychological resin test: use in clinical medicine (analytical review). Therapeutic Archive 2008; 4: 89-92.
13 Taylor GJ, Ryan DP, Bagby RM. Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics1985; 44: 191-9.
14 Dellinger S. Psychogeometric: How to use geometric psychology to influence people. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1989; 199 p.
15 Garber El, Kozacha VV. Psycho-Geometric Testing. Saratov: Nauchnaya kniga, 1999; 72 p.
16 Velikanov АА. The structure and dynamics of emotional states in patients with coronary heart disease during treatment in a hospital: PhD diss. 2009; 190 p.
17 Trifonova ЕА. Alatonic potential of personality and psychosomatic risk: the problem of coping competence. Izvestia: Herzen State University Journal of Humanities and Science 2013; 155: 71-83.

AttachmentSize
2019_03-1_744-749.pdf1.22 MB

No votes yet