Complications after different surgical methods of setting polypropylene suburethral meshes in women with stress urinary incontinence
Year: 2018, volume 14 Issue: №2 Pages: 277-280
Heading: Urology Article type: Original article
Authors: Eisenakh I.A., Korotkevich O.S., Mozes V.G., Vlasova V.V.
Organization: Kemerovo State Medical University, Novokuznetsk State Clinical Hospital № 1
Heading: Urology Article type: Original article
Authors: Eisenakh I.A., Korotkevich O.S., Mozes V.G., Vlasova V.V.
Organization: Kemerovo State Medical University, Novokuznetsk State Clinical Hospital № 1
Summary:
The aim: to determine the complication's rate, based on a seven-year experience, after the stress urinary incontinence correction in women with different methods of setting suburethral polypropylene meshes. Material and Methods. The analysis of seven years of experience of surgical correction with different methods of setting suburethral meshes in 1260 women with stress urinary incontinence; obturator fixation the mesh inside-outside and outside-inside: supra-pubic fixation the mesh; non-trocar fixation the mesh type mini-sling was carried out. Results. The greatest frequency of complications were identified in the first two years of implementation the setting of suburethral meshes, after that the complication's rate decreased progressively and it was in the range 7-8% the last three years. The frequency of early operative complications at a different setting of suburethral meshes had no statistically significant differences, but there were more the statistically significant intraoperative and mesh-associated complications at suprapubic fixation. Conclusion. The study confirms that the installation of suburethral meshes by the method of suprapubic fixation of mesh is associated with a higher incidence of complications and should be performed only in the target group of patients who are not suitable for surgical correction in safer ways.
Bibliography:
1. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Berghmans LC, et al. Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence / European Association of Urology, 2015; 75 p.
2. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 Apr 30; (4): CD004014
3. Shaikh S, Ong EK, Glavind K, et al. Mechanical devices for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 Jul 19; (3): CD001756
4. Herbison GP, Arnold EP. Sacral neuromodulation with implanted devices for urinary storage and voiding dysfunction in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 Apr 15; (2): CD004202
5. Haylen ВТ, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn2011 Jan; 30(1): 2-12
6. NiemarkAl, Razdorskaya MV, Neimark BA. Correction of stress urinary incontinence in women with a suburethral meshes. Kazan Medical Journal 2012; 93 (3): 538-542
7. Eizenakh IA, Vlasova VV, Mozes VG, Zakharov IA. Early postoperative mesh-related complications after placing two-and four-sleeved synthetic of implants women with genitals prolapse. Medicine in Kuzbass 2017; 1 (16): 12-18
8. Nygaard IE, Shaw JM. Physical activity and the pelvic floor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 Feb; 214 (2): 164-171
9. Wein AJ. Tension-Free Vaginal Tape-Obturator for Treatment of Pure Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Adverse Effects at 10-Year Follow-up. J Urol 2018 Feb; 199 (2): 347-348
10. Rautenberg O, Zivanovic I, Kociszewski J, et al. Current Treatment Concepts for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2017 Nov 16; 106 (15):1-8.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2018_2_277-280.pdf | 223.89 KB |
Русский
English