Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Modern aspects of diagnostics and monitoring of tape-toretinal degeneration

Year: 2017, volume 13 Issue: №2 Pages: 422-426
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Nekhorosheva А.А., Popova T.S., Batishcheva Yu.S., Kolbenev I.O.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:

Objective: to evaluate the informativity of clinical and instrumental methods of examining patients with tapetoretinal abiotrophy (TRA). Material and Methods. 45 patients with a diagnosis ofTRA, divided into 3 groups: 1) 8 people (under 18 years); 2) 20 people (19-40 years); 3) 17 people (over 41 years). Performed: standard ophthalmological examination, computer perimetry (kinetic, static perimetry in the "Macula threashold 24-2bs" mode, OCULUS Twinfield device), fundus shots (TOPCON device), EPS* (Neuro-MEP device). Results. The average total value of the visual fields of the first group patients amounted to 394±23°, the second group has 173±26° result and the third group has 86±15° result. Mean deviation of the bacillary component of electroretinogram in the first group has reached 53.8±10.4%, 70.2±4.3% in the second group and 84.7±7.3% in the third group. As for the rhythmic component, the indicators were following: 20.3±4.3%, 41.6±5.2%, 62.3±6.4% in the first, second and the third groups respectively. The data of static perimetry showed a decrease in the average photosensitivity in the central parts with respect to the population's age. According to the data of ophthalmoscopy the bony bodies' remoteness of the location from the center of the fundus corresponds to the degree of narrowing of the field of vision. Conclusion. There is a significant relationship between the total value of the peripheral boundaries of the visual field, electroretinogram data and perimetry.

Bibliography:
1. Avetisov SJe, Egorov EA, Moshetova LK. National guidelines for ophthalmology M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2008; 944 p.
2. Maubaret С, Hamel С. Genetics of retinitis pigmentosa: metabolic classification and phenotype/genotype correlations it. J Fr Ophtalmol 2005; 28 (2): 71-92
3. Rivolla C, Sharon D, DeAngetis MM, et al. Retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases; numerous diseases, genes, and inheritance patterns. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11:1219-1227
4. Shamshinova AM. Hereditary and congenital diseases of the retina and optic nerve. M.: Medicina, 2001; 528 p.
5. Kamenskikh TG, Myshkina EJu, Radchenko EJu, et al. The article presents the results of the treatment of the patient with primary glaucoma by «Retinalamin». Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2006; 2 (2): 26-29
6. Egorov EA, Kamenskikh ID, Kamenskikh TG, et al. Effect of dynamic transcranial magnetic therapy and laser stimulation on retinal ganglion cell activity and BDNF levels. The RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2016; (1): 19-24
7. Bashkatov AN, Genina JeA, Kamenskih TG, et al. Investigation of Mildronat ® Diffusion in Human Eye Sclera. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New series. Series: Physics. 2016; 16 (3): 167-177
8. Ruban JeD. Eye Diseases: Newest reference book. Rostov on/D: Feniks, 2016; 360 p.

AttachmentSize
2017_02-1_422-426.pdf702.79 KB

No votes yet