Comparison and interpretation of the dermatological health-related quality of life and SKINDEX-29 in patients with different subtypes of rosacea
Year: 2015, volume 11 Issue: №3 Pages: 401-405
Heading: Dermatovenerology Article type: Short message
Authors: Davydova A.M., Bakulev A.L
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Heading: Dermatovenerology Article type: Short message
Authors: Davydova A.M., Bakulev A.L
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:
Aim: comparison and interpretation of dermatological health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and SKINDEX-29 in patients with different subtypes of rosacea. Materials and methods. Questionnaires HRQoL and SKINDEX-29 (which is very slightly described and categorized in Russian literature) were used to question 48 patients with rosacea of 3 subtypes (the 1st, the 2nd and the 3rd). The data resulting from the study were processed statistically and tabulated. Results. Sensitivity and interchangeability SKINDEKS-29 and HRQoL were confirmed for patients with different subtypes of rosacea. A more detailed description and interpretation of SKINDEX-29 will increase the understanding of the scores obtained in patients with any dermatological pathology. The use of two questionnaires, investigating the quality of life, increases the control of psychosocial examination and the most narrowly figures details. Conclusions. Conversion of abstract SKINDEX-29 points and its clear categorization into clinically significant quantities will help to form, manage and to unite, if necessary, groups of patients, depending on the parameters of emotional, physical symptoms and psychological functioning for partnerships in the "doctor— patient" system.
Bibliography:
1. Kochergin N.G., Smirnova L.M. Dermatology quality of life as a psychosomatic symptom dermatosis. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases 2006; (4): 11-15
2. Adaskevich V.P. Diagnostic index in dermatology. Moscow: Med. Science, 2004; 146-164 p.
3. Abeni D, Picardi A, Pasquini Р, Melchi CF, Chren MM. Further evidence of the validity and reliability of the Skindex-29: an Italian study on 2,242 dermatological outpatients. Dermatology 2002; 204: 43-49
4. Prinsen CA, Lindeboom R, Sprangers MA, et al. Health-related quality of life assessment in dermatology: interpretation of Skindex-29 scores using patient-based anchors. J Invest Derma-tol 2010; 130: 1318-1322
5. Prinsen CA, Lindeboom R, Korte de J. Interpretation of Skindex-29 scores: cutoffs for mild, moderate, and severe impairment of health-related quality of life. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 1945-1947
6. Misery L, Finlay AY, Martin N, et al. Atopic dermatitis: impact on the quality of life of patients and their partners. Dermatology 2007; 215: 123-129
7. Seikowski K, Gelbrich M, Harth W. Sexuelle Selbstre-flexion bei Patienten mit Neurodermitis und Psoriasis. Hautarzt 2008; 59: 297-303
8. Nijsten T, Sampogna F, Abeni D. Categorization of Skindex-29 scores using mixture analysis. Dermatology 2009; 218: 151-154
9. Kubanova AA, Martinov AA. The concept and definition of the quality of life of patients in dermatology. Journal of Dermatology 2004; (4): 16-19
10. Sampogna F, Abeni D. Interpretation of Skindex-29 scores. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 1790-17922
11. Efimenko SA, Reshetnikov AV. The conducting medical and sociological monitoring. Teaching aid. 2007; p. 9-14.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2015_03-01_401-405.pdf | 323.57 KB |
Русский
English