Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding

Year: 2015, volume 11 Issue: №3 Pages: 323-327
Heading: Surgery Article type: Original article
Authors: Potakhin S.N., Shapkin Yu.G., Vlasova M.A., Nikitin V.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:

Aim of the investigation: to conduct a comparative analysis of methods of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis ofthe extent of the surgical and anesthetic risks and results of treatment of 71 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding has been conducted in the study. To evaluate the surgical and anesthetic risks classification trees are used, scale ТА. Rockall and prognosis System of rebleeding (SPRK), proposed by N. V. Lebedev et al. in 2009, enabling to evaluate the probability of a fatal outcome. To compare the efficacy ofthe methods the following indicators are used: sensitivity, specificity and prediction of positive result. Results. The study compared the results ofthe risk assessment emergency operation by using these methods with the outcome ofthe operation. The comparison ofthe prognosis results in sensitivity leads to the conclusion that the scales ТА. Rockall and SPRK are worse than the developed method of classification trees in recognizing patients with poor outcome of surgery. Conclusion. The method of classification trees can be considered as the most accurate method of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding.

Bibliography:
1. Potahin SN, Shapkin YG, Klimashevich VY, Belikov AV, Zevyakina VA. Current status of the problem of the treatment of peptic ulcer bleedings (review). Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2014; 10 (1): 132-139
2. Sokolova PY, Klimov АЕ, Lebedev NV, et al. Comparative evaluation of relapse prediction systems in gastroduo-denal ulcer bleeding. A country doctor 2012; 4 (15): 65-66
3. Potakhin SN, Shapkin YuG, Chalyk YuV, Zevyakina VA. Evaluation of severity and prognosis of the disease course in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding (review). Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2014; 10 (2): 301-307
4. Potakhin SN, Shapkin YuG. Evaluation of the operative and anesthetic risk for patients with ulcerative gastro-duodenal bleedings. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2014; 10 (4): 663-669
5. Rockall ТА, Logan RFA, Devlin НВ, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38: 316-321
6. Lebedev NV, Klimov AE, Barkhudarova TV. Prognosis for relapse of gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. Khirurgiya: Zhur-nal imeni N.I. Pirogova (Surgery) 2009; 2: 32-34
7. Vlasov V. V. Reliable information about the effectiveness of any diagnostic test? Therapia. Ukrainian Medical Vestnik 2006; 9 (07)
8. Vlasov V.V. Reliable information about the effectiveness of any diagnostic test? Therapia: Ukrainian Medical Vestnik 2006; 10 (08)/

No votes yet