Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Psychological factors of professional success of nuclear power plant main control room operators

Summary:

Aim: to conduct a comparative analysis of the psychological characteristics of the most and least successful main control room operators. Material and Methods. Two NPP staff groups: the most and least successful main control room operators, who worked in routine operating conditions, were surveyed. Expert evaluation method has been applied to identify the groups. The subjects were administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Cattell's Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF form A) and Raven's Progressive Matrices test. Results. Numerous significant psychological differences between the groups of most and least successful control room operators were obtained: the best operators were significantly more introverted and correctly solved more logical tasks with smaller percentage of mistakes under time pressure than worst ones. Conclusions: 1. The psychodiagnostic methods used in the study were adequate to meet research objective 2. Tendency to introversion, as well as developed the ability to solve logic problems undertime pressure, apparently, are important professional qualities for control room operators. These indicators should be considered in the process of psychological selection and professional guidance of nuclear power plant operators.

Bibliography:
1. Meshkati N. Human Factors in Large-Scale Technological Systems' Accidents: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl. Industrial Crisis Quarterly 1991; 5: 131 -154
2. Abramova VN, Volkov EV, Melnikova IV, et al. Development of professiograms of NPP personnel professional activities: psychological aspects. In: Works of psychological services in nuclear energetics and industry. Obninsk, 2010; Vol. 4, p. 65-70
3. Abramova VN, Belekhov VV, Bel'skaya EG, et al. Psychological methods in the work with the staff at NPP. Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 1988; 192 p.
4. Kulagin BV Fundamentals of professional psycho-diagnostics. Leningrad: Medicine, 1984; 216 p.
5. Navatikyan АО, Kryzhanovskaya VV, Kal'nish VV. Physiology and hygiene of mental labour. Kiev: Zdorov'a, 1987; 194 p.
6. Tyshlek EG. Methods of estimating the success of operators' professional activities: PhD thesis (psychological sciences), Moscow, 1984; 168 p.
7. Berezin F. В., Miroshnikov М.Р, Rozhanets R.V A method of multi-lateral personality investigation. Moscow: Meditsi-na, 1976; 186 p.
8. Berezin FB, Miroshnikov МР, & Sokolova ED. A method of multi-lateral personality investigation. (Third edition). Moscow: Consultant Plus — Novye tekhnologii, 2011; 318 p.
9. Melnikov VM & Yampolsky LT Introduction to experimental psychology of personality. Moscow: Prosveschenie, 1985; 320 p.
10. Pokhilko VI & Shmelev AG. Psychodiagnostics of traits (test questionnaires and subjective scaling of traits). Ch. 4 in: General psychodiagnostics. Ed. by A. Bodalev and V Stolin. Moscow: MGU, 1987; p. 113-134
11. Jung, CG., Psychological Types. Saint Petersburg: Az-buka, 2001; 732 p. Russian (Юнг К. Г. Психологические типы. СПб.: Азбука, 2001; 732 с.

AttachmentSize
2014_04-01_758-761.pdf434.46 KB

No votes yet