Variability of cephalometric parameters of men with orthognathic and direct occlusion
Year: 2014, volume 10 Issue: №1 Pages: 52-55
Heading: Macro- and Micromorphology Article type: Original article
Authors: Sheludko S.N., Muzurova L.V., Konnov V.V., Mikheeva M.V.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Heading: Macro- and Micromorphology Article type: Original article
Authors: Sheludko S.N., Muzurova L.V., Konnov V.V., Mikheeva M.V.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:
The aim: to study the variability of morphometric parameters of the head of men of 21-35 years old, with orthognathic and direct occlusion and identify their differences. Material and Methods. Cephalometry performed in 93 men aged 21 to 35 years from the Saratov region. Distribution groups conducted for the type of physiological occlusion: orthognathic (n=61) and direct (n=32). To determine the parameters used cephalometric anthropometric standard set of tools. On the head cephalometric points were determined between which measured morphometric parameters of the cranial and facial departments, as well as parameters of soft tissue structures. Results. In men with physiological occlusion parameters having statistically significant differences in orthognathic and direct bite were identified: head length, morphological face height, the height of nasal and maxillary division, mandibular body height, width of the face, the angular width of the face. Average values of these parameters are more prevalent in men who have a direct bite.
Conclusion. The data obtained should be considered during orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment, with lectures and practical training in the departments and faculties of the human anatomy with the dental profile.
Keywords: cephalometriy, orthognathic and direct occlusion
Bibliography:
1. Gidarakou IK, Tallents RH, Kyrkanides S, et al. Comparsion of Skeletal and Dental Morphology in Asymtomatic Volunteers and Symptomatic Patients with Normal Temporomandibular Joints. Angle Orthodontist 2003; (2): 116-120;
2. Uzhumetskene II. Methods of research in orthodontics. Moscow: Meditsina, 1970; 199 p.;
3. Muzurova LV. Morpho-topology and geometric patterns skull design for different types of malocclusion. D. Sc. dissertation. Volgograd, 2006; 436 p.;
4. Almond JR, Leroux BG, Knight DJ, Ramsay DS. Craniofacial Morphology and Tooth Wear: A Longitudinal Study os Orthodontic Patients. Angle Orthodontist 1999; (1): 7-13;
5. Betzenberger D, Ruf S, Panchez H The Compensotory mechanism in High-Angle Malocclusions: A comparsion of Subjects in the Mixed and Permanent Dentition. Angle Orthodontist 1999; (1): 27-32;
6. Sayin M, Turkkahraman H. Cephalometric Evaluation of Nongrowing Females with Skeletal and Dental Class II, division 1 Malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 2005; (4): 656-660;
7. Khoroshilkina FYa. Teleradiography in orthodontics. Moscow: Meditsina, 1976; 152 p.;
8. Hayashi К, Muguruma Т, Hamaya М, Mizoguchi I. Morphologic Characteristics of the Dentition and Palate in Cases of Skeletal Asymmetry. Angle Orthodontist 2004; (1): 26-30;
9. Alarashi M, Franchi L, MarinelliA, Defraia E. Morphometric Analysis of the Transverse Dentoskeletal Features of Class II Malocclusion in the Mixed Dentition. Angle Orthodontist 2003; (1): 21-25.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2014_01_52-55.pdf | 351.72 KB |
Русский
English